Thank you for this. I love Mearsheimer. Does it look like he's put on some weight? Hope the guys okay. It'll be a real loss of rationality if we lose that guy.
Thank you Mom! That is my goal. It turns out the truth is never black and white. It lies somewhere between the nuances of perspectives from each side of an issue. I’m just trying to search through perspectives myself and seek the truth no matter where it takes. If you come away from something I wrote knowing more than when you went in my work here is done.
Just got "fear and trembling" + "the sickness unto death" and "the present age" in the mail, and have "the essential " on the way, idk which one to read first? Lol. I might start at the "present" what do you think?
Oh, wow! So present age was written in his name and fear and trembling was written under a pseudonym. How fucking cool! Thank you. You have so much about this stuff. That’s so fucking cool!
I read about that yesterday, how fucking cool is that. At the end he wrote a book explaining his books and his different pseudonyms. Just a great writer, an interesting writer and also an interesting personality. Something I'm sure wasn't common back then. We're lucky to have one of those traits.
And for the record I’ve read every one of his books and the new one on the way, big fan of his debates, absolutely despise his “Neoconservatism and why we need it.”
Now that the veil has been lifted we know who he actually is. It sure ain’t who he represents in his books.
It seems his ghastly writing for the New York Post might be the best representation of who he actually is. He had a thick wool over our eyes.
Maybe I'm having a Mandela effect lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWcTYY1Dofg
Thank you for this. I love Mearsheimer. Does it look like he's put on some weight? Hope the guys okay. It'll be a real loss of rationality if we lose that guy.
He looks OK to me, I sure hope so. Yea, he's one of my favorite people.
Love your passion! I always come away knowing more.
Thank you Mom! That is my goal. It turns out the truth is never black and white. It lies somewhere between the nuances of perspectives from each side of an issue. I’m just trying to search through perspectives myself and seek the truth no matter where it takes. If you come away from something I wrote knowing more than when you went in my work here is done.
I love you as big as the world! Call tomorrow evening? Im off work Wednesday and Thursday.❤️❤️❤️
Yes I would love that. I love you big as the world. Time? ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Around 9.
Just got "fear and trembling" + "the sickness unto death" and "the present age" in the mail, and have "the essential " on the way, idk which one to read first? Lol. I might start at the "present" what do you think?
It looks like it's "the present age" and "the difference between an apostle and an apple" which seems like a good question. Lmao
Oh, wow! So present age was written in his name and fear and trembling was written under a pseudonym. How fucking cool! Thank you. You have so much about this stuff. That’s so fucking cool!
🤣🤣🤣
That’s like saying I learnt about the Titanic from watching Rose and Jack on the driftwood.
🤣🤣🤣
Please actually do a bit of research before boasting about what you know.
Especially if he’s gonna call for “standards”. A man in a glass house shouldn’t throw stones.
Right, way to tank your book sales. There should be a masterclass on this, “fucking up a book deal and ruining my reputation like a Master.”
“Exposing my idiocy like a master” and my favorite “Avoiding debate, during debate, by biting the hand that feeds me, like a master”
Whoa! The words are not usually his point. How amazing iab
Phone froze. "The words are not usually his point" so you've got to read through them. That's amazing! How cool!
Oh, I've got to get those booms next. Thank you.
I read about that yesterday, how fucking cool is that. At the end he wrote a book explaining his books and his different pseudonyms. Just a great writer, an interesting writer and also an interesting personality. Something I'm sure wasn't common back then. We're lucky to have one of those traits.
That’s why I made sure to “Doug” him up in my piece. Hahahahahaha!
Remember the Munk debates?
“Malc…”
And for the record I’ve read every one of his books and the new one on the way, big fan of his debates, absolutely despise his “Neoconservatism and why we need it.”
Now that the veil has been lifted we know who he actually is. It sure ain’t who he represents in his books.
It seems his ghastly writing for the New York Post might be the best representation of who he actually is. He had a thick wool over our eyes.