In my view, the only thing he did wrong and the Hunter Biden story did wrong was release private addresses, phone numbers, and ssn information. I wish we could just all agree not to release those things. The rest? Fair game. I've been a subscriber to Ken since he came over to Substack, so I stand with him here, too. You can't just stand for free speech when it's speech you like. That's not worth a thing. And, like you, I didn't think the dossier really did any harm. It didn't in my mind, anyway. Good on you for standing up.
Thank you. You too. Yea, those things really could’ve been redacted. It seems like I heard him say that he felt because of where it came from he didn’t want to redact anything out of it so it would be more authentic. I might be butchering that. I’m not sure where that argument came from or what the principle is behind it but I understand the thought that all these things can be found online because he’s a public figure, but I also understand that nobody, not even public figures want all that information packed into a neat bow lol. My main thing with is supporting Ken and how interesting the dossier was. It’s really wild to see how this stuff is decided, and the insane amount of anti-trump things he’d said, I knew he’d expressed that he didn’t support the guy but damn! Lol. And I found it really interesting that whoever compiled this broke it down by who would support it and what views moderate would be for and against and establishment republicans, and false republican views and just every group of voters and how they’ll see JD’s views. Maybe I’m naive but I never would’ve guessed it. When you’re in jail and you take a guilty plea, before your final sentencing they have you fill out a packet and it’s everything about your life from childhood to present-day goes in that packet and that’s what that thing felt like, pre-sentence investigation+social media, lmao.
In my view, the only thing he did wrong and the Hunter Biden story did wrong was release private addresses, phone numbers, and ssn information. I wish we could just all agree not to release those things. The rest? Fair game. I've been a subscriber to Ken since he came over to Substack, so I stand with him here, too. You can't just stand for free speech when it's speech you like. That's not worth a thing. And, like you, I didn't think the dossier really did any harm. It didn't in my mind, anyway. Good on you for standing up.
Thank you. You too. Yea, those things really could’ve been redacted. It seems like I heard him say that he felt because of where it came from he didn’t want to redact anything out of it so it would be more authentic. I might be butchering that. I’m not sure where that argument came from or what the principle is behind it but I understand the thought that all these things can be found online because he’s a public figure, but I also understand that nobody, not even public figures want all that information packed into a neat bow lol. My main thing with is supporting Ken and how interesting the dossier was. It’s really wild to see how this stuff is decided, and the insane amount of anti-trump things he’d said, I knew he’d expressed that he didn’t support the guy but damn! Lol. And I found it really interesting that whoever compiled this broke it down by who would support it and what views moderate would be for and against and establishment republicans, and false republican views and just every group of voters and how they’ll see JD’s views. Maybe I’m naive but I never would’ve guessed it. When you’re in jail and you take a guilty plea, before your final sentencing they have you fill out a packet and it’s everything about your life from childhood to present-day goes in that packet and that’s what that thing felt like, pre-sentence investigation+social media, lmao.